Coronation Day

As an English person who has made Scotland my home and fervently supports the cause of Scottish independence, the upcoming coronation of King Charles III poses a significant paradox. While the occasion carries historical and traditional weight, it also reignites the age-old debate surrounding the relevance and legitimacy of the monarchy in a modern society.

The coronation of a monarch is a momentous event, steeped in centuries of tradition and pomp. For many, it symbolizes continuity, stability, and national identity. However, as an anti-monarchist, I view this tradition as an anachronism, a relic of the past that hinders progress towards a more democratic and egalitarian society.

Living in Scotland, a nation that has consistently expressed its desire for self-determination, the coronation takes on added significance. It serves as a stark reminder of the unequal union between Scotland and England, where the monarchy is seen by many as a symbol of English dominance and centralization of power. The question of Scottish independence inevitably looms larger during such occasions, igniting feelings of frustration and disillusionment.

Advocates for the monarchy argue that it provides a unifying force, bringing together people from different backgrounds and beliefs. However, as a supporter of Scottish independence, I believe that true inclusivity can only be achieved by embracing a republican system that places power in the hands of the people rather than an unelected monarch. The coronation, therefore, becomes a stark reminder of the hierarchical structure that perpetuates inequality.

In an era marked by global challenges, increasing social awareness, and demands for greater transparency, the monarchy’s relevance is called into question. As an anti-monarchist, I believe that the time has come for the United Kingdom to reassess its constitutional framework and embrace a more modern and accountable form of governance.

Living in Scotland while identifying as English creates an interesting dynamic during events like the coronation. It forces me to reflect on my own identity and consider the potential implications of supporting Scottish independence while observing the ceremonial traditions of the monarchy. The balance between respecting cultural heritage and advocating for change is a delicate one, requiring introspection and open dialogue.

The coronation of King Charles III presents a unique challenge for someone like me—an anti-monarchist residing in Scotland and supporting Scottish independence. It serves as a reminder of the deep-rooted traditions and inequalities that persist within the United Kingdom. However, it also highlights the importance of engaging in constructive conversations about the future of the monarchy and the democratic aspirations of the Scottish people. As the country continues to grapple with its constitutional future, it is vital to embrace diversity, challenge the status quo, and strive for a more inclusive and equitable society.

I actually thought I’d give watching the coronation ceremony a shot, from an anthropology interest point. It all started with Christian praise and offerings, making the whole thing even more objectionable. It’s another layer of oppression, excluding those of other faiths and none from proceedings. I lasted three minutes, got annoyed, switched it off and went for a curry. In my opinion a much more British activity.